Background
In recent years, genetic engineering has had a tremendous impact
on the agricultural sector, while at the same time raising a number
of questions from scientists, environmentalists, and the general
public. Concerns over the effects in agriculture, on the environment,
and for human health remain unanswered. Although a general federal
regulation scheme exists to regulate genetically engineered (GE)
organisms, it is outdated and complex. Federal regulations are a
patchwork, with three federal agencies and potentially twelve federal
laws comprising the framework developed in 1986. In the last few
years, a number of public events, including the release of Starlink
corn into commercially available food products, have also revealed
the insufficiency of the regulations.
States have moved to address the lack of formal regulations in
the rapidly changing area of biotechnology. States introduced over
100 bills in 31 states in the 2001-2002 session and 130 bills in
32 states in the 2003 session, which covered a range of topics including
prosecuting protesters for the destruction of GE crops, effects
on organic agriculture, labeling, and liability issues. It is important
for states to discuss how they will deal with GE organisms because
of the potential effects these organisms will have on state agricultural
and economic sectors.
The framework for this package was taken from strategies suggested
in a report published by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology
analyzing state legislative trends on the topic of genetic engineering.(1)
Three strategies are addressed by the sample bills included in this
package: labeling, liability, and a ban. Although there are additional
strategies and tactics, the ones chosen, if passed, would be effective
and comprehensive in addressing the use of GE organisms.
Bills from New York (A 4458 and A 2826) and Massachusetts (S 1912)
serve as the sample bills used for this package. For more examples
of state legislation, see the state
activity page for this topic. |