Background
The variety and magnitude of species and habitats in the United
States is rapidly declining. This loss of biodiversity poses risks
to ecosystems and human health. Most states attempt to protect biodiversity
through single species protection efforts under the Endangered Species
Act, specific land conservation efforts, or invasive species laws.
While these tools take steps to curtail species’ loss, they
are often scattered, uncoordinated, or underfunded.
States are equipped to formulate and implement essential land use
policies. State governments have influence over much of the state
land area, and have the primary responsibility for the wildlife
within their borders. Therefore, states play an important role in
biodiversity conservation. Individual states are better able to
tailor programs to prioritize biodiversity in crisis, detect primary
threats, and develop comprehensive programs to protect species and
ecosystems.
Many federal regulations used to protect biodiversity are administered
at the state level, enabling individual states to customize national
environmental programs, such as the Endangered Species Act. The
act authorizes states to conduct statewide assessments of biodiversity
and establish programs to protect it, as in Delaware, Hawaii, Florida,
and Massachusetts.(1) Statewide strategies
incorporating state, federal, and local laws, statewide biodiversity
research, and state policy concerns will enhance current federal
regulations that are unable to comprehensively protect states against
biodiversity loss before species and their habitats are at risk.
Many state governments recognize the need for a more comprehensive,
statewide program with coordinated state and local efforts to preserve
ecosystems. Data on the variety and quantity of species, ecosystem
interaction, and causes for biodiversity loss must be collected
for each state. From this data, a comprehensive biodiversity policy
can be created. Fortunately, every state has access to biodiversity
information through Natural Heritage Programs, and most states can
utilize Gap
Analysis Program (GAP) data. GAP programs have been completed
in a vast majority of states and are in progress in the remaining
states. As a first step, states need to synchronize GAP, Natural
Heritage, and supplementary biodiversity data from nonprofit, educational,
and government sources into a comprehensive database. Then states
can begin to review and assess existing programs and develop a statewide
policy.
State biodiversity conservation plans should include:
- Biological inventory and assessment;
- Statewide strategy and implementation plans;
- Habitat protection;
- Policy / legal review;
- Public education and public and media outreach campaigns;
- Clearly defined goals;
- Defined leadership structure;
- Sufficient funding; and
- A broad base of stakeholders.
Statewide biodiversity policy has been developed and integrated
in various ways, including governor’s executive orders, memorandums
of understanding, and statutory law. The language for the state
Biodiversity Conservation Act integrates four sources: Washington
SB 6400 (2002); New York Consolidated Education Law, Title 1, Article
5, Part 1, Section 235-A; Michigan Compiled Laws, Act 451 of 1994
(Chapter 324, Sections 35501-35506); and, a model statute published
by the American Planning Association in the “Growing Smart
Legislation Guidebook.” Washington SB 6400 was signed into
law by Governor Gary Locke on April 1, 2002. The New York Biodiversity
Research Institute was statutorily created in 1993 by SB 5072. The
Michigan law was enacted in 1994.
Washington SB 6400 sets up a temporary committee to assess biodiversity
and conservation problems, needs, and solutions. The bill sets up
a committee, consisting of a diverse set of stakeholders, to develop
recommendations for a long-range, statewide biodiversity conservation
plan.
Defenders of Wildlife has completed an assessment of statewide
biodiversity strategies, Saving
Biodiversity: A Status Report of State Programs, Policies and Laws.
Updated information is available at Biodiversity
Partners. |