Home > State Info > Innovative Legislation > Biodiversity
Back to Policy Issues Package

ISSUE: BIODIVERSITY

Biodiversity is the variety and variability of life. We depend on the planet’s diverse biology to provide many essential products and functions, including food, clean air and water, medicines, shelter, fertile soil, crop pollination, drought and flood control, and recreation. If we fail to protect the species that provide these services, the earth’s ecosystem will suffer. When any part of the planet’s biodiversity disappears, ecosystems become weak and inefficient, threatening the health and maintenance of all life.

Habitat destruction and fragmentation, urban sprawl, wetland drainage, road development, environmental contaminants, global climate change, pollution, invasive species, and overexploitation of resources are all contributing to the destruction of global biodiversity. In the United States, over 30% of freshwater fish species and 40% of amphibians are threatened or have already become extinct.

In 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s independent Science Advisory Board identified species extinction and habitat loss as two of the highest risks to “natural ecology and human welfare.” But, too often, biodiversity conservation programs within states are underfunded, uncoordinated, and fragmented. The following is a list of adopted state legislative efforts that implement effective and efficient statewide biodiversity conservation programs.

State Legislation

California
The Agreement on Biological Diversity is a 1991 Memorandum of Understanding among federal, state, and local entities. The policy identifies the need to develop regional and statewide biological diversity plans, and has resulted in the California Legacy Project and the California Biodiversity Council.  

Kentucky
In 1994, a Biodiversity Task Force was developed by Executive Order to recommend strategies to preserve biodiversity. In 1995, another Executive Order created the Biodiversity Council, comprised of state agency directors and leaders of the scientific community.  

Maryland
In Maryland, the Governor’s Executive Committee instituted a biodiversity policy for state-owned lands containing forests. The policy declared that the conservation of biological diversity should be incorporated into all state land use planning decisions pertaining to state-owned forest lands. The declaration also designated an interagency team to develop strategies and make recommendations on biodiversity conservation.

Michigan
Act 451 of 1994 (Chapter 324, Sections 35501-35506) established a temporary committee to create a biodiversity conservation strategy to reduce biodiversity loss, identify species of special concern, coordinate efforts, and evaluate progress. The committee utilized information from various state departments relative to the causes of biodiversity loss, costs and benefits of biodiversity conservation, and techniques to protect against biodiversity loss.  

New York
New York Consolidated Education Law §235-A establishes the New York State Biodiversity Research Institute. The institute coordinates state, local, and private environmental efforts into a statewide biodiversity policy and develops priorities and implementation plans.

Washington
SB 6400 develops a statewide biodiversity conservation strategy. It also authorizes funding for a temporary conservation committee to perform a comprehensive review to identify the state’s needs for biodiversity data and conservation programs, and makes recommendations for a long-term biodiversity strategy.

This package was last updated on June 2, 2004.

The SERC project has been discontinued due to lack of funding. We apologize, but it’s unlikely that we’ll be able to respond to requests for information about the material posted on this site.