Frequently Asked Questions
Q. What is Pay-As-You-Drive
(PAYD) insurance?
A. PAYD policies
still incorporate the traditional rate factors, such as driver history
(years of experience, moving violations, previous crashes), geographic
location, and vehicle type. The policies would just charge on a
per-mile or per-minute basis.
Conventional auto insurance charges a fixed rate
for a specified period of coverage. It matters not how little, how
often, or how far the vehicle is driven. Unlike conventional auto
insurance, PAYD pricing utilizes a variable cost with respect to
vehicle travel, so premiums are directly related to mileage.
More than 80% of the costs of owning a vehicle are
fixed, and traditional vehicle insurance has always been considered
a fixed cost. Once a person has a vehicle and insurance, there is
very little incentive not to use it. Conversion from a conventional
auto insurance pricing scheme to PAYD would increase the variable
costs to nearly 50%.(1)
PAYD policies are more actuarially accurate, better
reflecting the true claim costs of each vehicle. PAYD provides drivers
an opportunity to save money and an incentive to be efficient in
their vehicle use (e.g., consolidating multiple errands into single
trips, carpooling, using mass transit, walking, biking, etc.).
Accuracy improves significantly if mileage is incorporated
in addition to currently-used risk/rate factors. The current system
undercharges high-mileage motorists and overcharges low-mileage
motorists.(2)
PAYD represents the principle that prices should
reflect costs. Persons who drive less simply cost less to insure.
Under the traditional system, low-mileage drivers subsidize high-mileage
drivers.(2)
Traditional policies essentially amount to all-you-can-drive
policies, encouraging gorging and over-consumption, much like an
all-you-can-eat buffet; i.e., you have already paid a flat rate
for the insurance, so you might as well use it. With PAYD insurance,
there is an incentive to consolidate trips, since additional miles
cost additional money. Reduced mileage results from the realization
that certain trips “just are not worth it.”(2)
Q. Don’t
insurance companies already provide discounts based on mileage?
A. Current policies
do offer slight discounts for low-mileage drivers, but the low-mileage
discount does not remotely reflect the difference in accident risk
between high- and low-mileage drivers. A 50% reduction in mileage
results in a premium discount of only 5-10%. And, the discount is
applied to your next term – not the term in which you drove
half as much as you expected. Motorists, therefore, do not perceive
savings in premiums when they reduce mileage.(2)
Q. Who would benefit
from PAYD?
A. We all would.
Seniors, students, low-income consumers, women (who drive 40% less
than men and have 40% less accidents), and car owners who drive
infrequently would likely benefit directly by saving money on their
car insurance. However, everyone would benefit from the expected
increase in number of insured drivers and from the decrease in traffic
and air pollution.
Q. How would the
insurance company track mileage?(2)
A. There are three
main options for tracking vehicle miles traveled: manual odometer
audits, continuous tracking via Global Positioning Systems (GPS)
or Global Locating Systems (GLS), or the use of radio frequency
identification devices.
Manual odometer audits could be performed at motor
vehicle inspection facilities or approved vehicle service facilities.
Mileage information could be transmitted directly from the auditor
to the insurance company, or the consumer could send a copy of the
statement. Odometer audits would take 5-10 minutes and vehicles
could be inspected to protect against fraud (calibration of odometer,
tire size, etc.). Odometer audits would require no new technology,
could be done during required inspections or routine services, and
involve few privacy concerns. A simpler version would allow vehicle
owners to report their own mileage, verified by random spot checks
conducted by the insurance company.
GPS- or GLS-tracking utilizes technology contained
within the vehicle (e.g., OnStar® GPS system). Data can either
be collected by automated cell phone transmissions or on computer
memory cards. Many vehicles already contain the technology (e.g.,
OnStar® GPS system); other consumers would pay to have a system
added. Consumers would pay a nominal, on-going fee for the monitoring
of the mileage. However, possession of the system would also allow
the consumer to utilize other technology-based services, such as
emergency assistance and real-time route planning. GPS-tracking
allows the insurance company to track where, when, and how long
a vehicle is driven. The company can then adjust rates based on
road location and time of day. The equipment, if not already preloaded,
can be placed under any of the seats or in the trunk.
GPS / GLS technology easily tracks mileage, reducing
consumer effort, and might allow consumers to download detailed
information from the Internet regarding their driving patterns,
etc.
One major concern consumers have with a GPS system
is privacy and confidentiality. It is also initially more expensive
for the consumer, and there are costs associated with switching
the technology to another vehicle.
A third tracking option utilizes a tag or computer
chip attached to odometer sensor, which transmits current odometer
readings and vehicle information. This technology would track the
mileage only – not vehicle location – and could be designed
to transmit information at any interval (e.g., once per week, once
per month). Radio technology is less expensive than GPS technology
and reduces privacy concerns. It still, however, requires equipment
installation and the construction of a system of data collection
by the insurance company.
Q. How would the
premium be calculated, and how would I be billed?
A. The premium could
either be calculated entirely on a per-mile basis or could consist
of a fixed amount to which the per-mile premium is added. Similarly,
the rate could be fixed at a per-mile cost, or could vary, depending
on the vehicle location and time of day (this requires GPS / GLS
technology).
There are basically two main payment options: prepayment
with a credit/refund or mileage billing. Under a prepayment system,
consumers would pay a premium based on an average mileage at the
beginning of their term. Policyholders would be given a refund for
unused miles or pay any outstanding balance. For example, if a consumer
pays $720 for a 12,000 mile standard policy, but only drives 8,000
miles, he / she would receive a $240 refund; if a consumer drives
16,000 miles, he / she would owe $240. Some administrative costs
would probably be associated with calculating and processing refunds
or outstanding balance payments. A second option would be monthly
billing, similar to that done by utilities. This method is more
intensive and expensive, requiring more frequent collection of data
and processing costs.
Q. If this idea
is so great, why aren’t insurance companies already providing
PAYD insurance?
A. Insurance companies
have, in general, opposed PAYD pricing because it would mean significant
changes in the way business is conducted (installing GPS units,
establishing audit networks, etc.) and may reduce long-term profits
by reducing gross premiums collected. Remember, though, that while
the insurance company may lose money in premiums, they will also
pay less money out in collision claims. The initial start-up costs
can be extensive, which is why the sample bill in this package provides
a tax credit for companies that offer PAYD.
The majority of the policyholders are unaware of
the PAYD concept and its potential benefits, and thus have not requested
this kind of service from insurance companies.(1)
Research indicates widespread interest in PAYD policies among those
who are aware of them. Once the option is available and publicized,
companies offering PAYD policies can expect to see an increase in
the number of policies as drivers with a second, seldom-driven car
or those who are low-income and find insurance costs prohibitive
take out PAYD policies.
Q. Aren’t
factors like age, locale, and driving history far more relevant
to accident risk than the number of miles driven?
A. That may or may
not be true. Until recently, reliable sources of mileage data were
unavailable to insurance companies, as was the ability to accurately
determine a relationship between mileage and claims. Nonetheless,
all of the other factors are relatively static during a policy period,
whereas mileage is the one factor that can be substantially adjusted.
Plus, data from independent odometer readings does show a strong
relationship between mileage and claims within the current rate
and risk categories.(2)
Q. Doesn’t
PAYD insurance discriminate against high-mileage drivers?
A. Actually, no.
PAYD increases fairness, thereby reducing the current discrimination
against low-mileage drivers by charging premiums that accurately
reflect the true cost of high-mileage driving. |