Wildlines Archives
Volume II, Number 5
February 3, 2003
A publication of the State Environmental Resource Center (SERC) bringing you the most important news on state environmental issues from across the country.
 
NEWS FROM THE STATES:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Using FOIAs to Protect Our Environment
Three States Will Sue EPA over CO2 Emissions
Missouri Surrenders Control over Its Water Quality
 
Colorado Bill OKs Logging in State Forests
Wildlife Affected by Tiny Temperature Change
Utah Gov. Seeks to Halt Use of Sales Tax Funds for Road Projects
Delaware Farms Eye New Waste Rules
Court Finds Alabama Standards Below U.S., Allows Citizen Suits
Michigan Environmental Groups Lobby for Wetlands
DEP Pushes for Tougher Rules on W. Virginia Logging
Report Rates States on Transportation Priorities
Gov. Would End SUV Tax Break in New York
Penn. Sues EPA over Lax Clean Air Rules
Michigan State Legislators Push Bills to Cut Landfill Imports
Bills for NM State Water Plan Introduced
Wyoming Panel Kills Instream Flow Bill
Wind Energy – A Hot Topic in South Dakota
Invasive Algae Smothering Florida Coral Reefs
CA Sues Grocers over Lack of Mercury Warnings
Court Reverses Ban on Dumping Coal Waste into Streams
Using FOIAs to Protect Our Environment
Any citizen can use a strong state open records law to help defend the environment. For instance, using a strong state Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), you can look at hazardous waste sites and chemical company records to see if any poisons have leaked into your neighborhood or to see what types of chemicals are stored nearby, determine what is being dumped in a landfill near your home, find out if an oil company has the authority to drill off the beach by your community, or locate facilities that manufacture or process harmful chemicals. If you would like to learn how to implement a strong FOIA in your state, please visit SERC's website at http://www.serconline.org/FOIA/index.html.
back to top
 
Three States Will Sue EPA over CO2 Emissions (Boston Globe 1/31/2003)
Arguing that the Bush administration is jeopardizing the health of its residents and violating clean-air laws by failing to regulate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, attorneys general from Massachusetts, Maine, and Connecticut yesterday announced they are suing the US Environmental Protection Agency. In the first suit of its kind filed by state governments, the attorneys general argue that CO2 should be added to the list of pollutants regulated under the Clean Air Act. CO2, a gas that occurs naturally but is also emitted by burning fossil fuels, is the biggest contributor to global warming. In a seven-page letter to the EPA administrator, the attorneys general argued that the agency is legally obliged to add CO2 to its list of regulated air pollutants. If the suit is successful, the EPA would set standards for how much CO2 can be in the air, and probably increase the regulation of power plants, among the biggest polluters. The "US Climate Action Report 2002," an EPA report sent to the United Nations, projects that greenhouse-gas emissions, or CO2 produced from the burning of fossil fuels, will increase 43 percent by 2020. "In the face of continued inaction, we, at the state level, have no choice but to use the remedies available to us to fill the void left at the federal level," Mass. A.G. Reilly said. "We need to begin tackling this problem today." In Mass., lawmakers have passed legislation that requires CO2 reductions by power plants. In NH, lawmakers have adopted "cap and trade" legislation to cut emissions. Last summer, CA Legislature passed a bill to achieve the "maximum feasible" reductions of carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles. It's unclear whether other states will join the three from New England or file their own suits.
back to top
 
Missouri Surrenders Control over Its Water Quality (St. Louis Post-Dispatch 1/10/03)
In a surprising and puzzling move, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources has announced that it will eliminate its water quality certification program and turn it over to the EPA. This move comes at a time when many states are questioning the federal government's ability to adequately protect their natural resources. The state has used the program in the past to block or modify proposals that would have polluted state waters, and it's questionable whether or not federal officials would have the same perspective. Environmentalists, legislators, and bureaucrats were all confused by the move, and the EPA was unsure if it could take on the program, since no state has given up a permitting program before. The DNR claims that the move was motivated by budget cuts. Carla Klein, of the Sierra Club, said the state's action sets a bad precedent. "Missouri, in general, wants to keep all the states' rights it can," she said. "Turning this one over is troublesome." For more environmentally friendly ways to save your state money, please see http://www.serconline.org/fiscal_issues.html.
back to top
 
Colorado Bill OKs Logging in State Forests (Denver Post 1/31/03)
A bill that would encourage logging in state parks is working its way through the Colorado legislature. Rep. Al White's HB1092 authorizes the state's Dept. of Natural Resources to log forests and make other changes to try to restore water to watersheds and to reduce fire danger. But environmental groups worried it would just open the forests to logging. The bill and a related measure passed out of committee. Rep. Matt Smith's HB1100, allows local and state governments to get involved in management of federal forests. Both measures will move on to the full House. "Some of my constituents think not only is the fox guarding the chicken house, but the fox has moved in," said Rep. Alice Madden, D-Boulder. She was the only member of the House Agriculture, Livestock and Natural Resources Committee to vote against the bill. Madden tried to amend the bill to expressly prevent clear-cutting, but the amendment failed 4-9. Dr. Colbert Cushing, a retired stream ecologist, said forest management and water management are sometimes in conflict. Forest management "is going to involve road building, it's going to involve logging," he said. "It's sufficient to say any increase in those activities will increase sediment in the streams, which has a vast array of negative" consequences.
back to top 
 
Wildlife Affected by Tiny Temperature Change (Environmental News Network 1/30/03)
Two studies in the journal Nature indicate that a one-degree temperature increase during the last century has been causing major changes for North American wildlife. Various species, from songbirds to butterflies, are migrating further north and the traditional signs of spring, including flowering or egg hatching, are happening much earlier. The effects on wildlife vary; early bird hatching could mean two clutches a year rather than one, while other species will be too sensitive to the temperature changes. These studies are unique in that they indicate the widespread response to temperature increases; past studies only showed effects on single species.
back to top 
 
Utah Gov. Seeks to Halt Use of Sales Tax Funds for Road Projects (Smart Growth Online 1/22/03)
In response to dwindling state revenue, Utah Governor Michael Leavitt announced during his State of the State address a need to overhaul the state's funding mechanisms. He specifically cited the need, "to discontinue the practice of funding road construction with sales tax dollars" and to "create a permanent, adequate, reliable, and conservation-oriented means to assure our water future." He stressed that the roadway and water supply projects were initiated during a time of abundance. The projects do not reflect conservation practices, those advocated in his Quality Growth program. For more information on the effects of suburban sprawl in your state visit http://www.serconline.org/sprawl/pkg_frameset.html.
back to top 
 
Delaware Farms Eye New Waste Rules (Dover Newszap 1/27/03)
In response to the federal government's new rules concerning Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), Delaware is looking at how to blend both sets of rules. The new rules call for states to develop new permitting programs for CAFOs, set stricter guidelines, and require a Nutrient Management Plan (NMP) before a CAFO is issued its water permit. A NMP would include basic components such as animal waste procedures, a required annual report and mandatory education. Delaware passed legislation in 1998 requiring farmers in the state to have Nutrient Management Plans by 2007, however many have complied voluntarily prior to 2007. Although the rules will change little in DE, other states may have a tougher time with compliance due to their decision to wait until federal rules were handed down. For more information on CAFOs visit http://www.serconline.org/cafos.html.
back to top 
 
Court Finds Alabama Standards Below U.S., Allows Citizen Suits (The Birmingham News, 01/30/03)
Alabama's water pollution enforcement is not up to the standards of federal law, an appeals court ruled in a decision that is expected to allow citizens to sue to enforce the Clean Water Act themselves. The public participation provisions in Alabama are not like the rights given to citizens under the Clean Water Act, differences that strike at the heart of whether the law allows citizens to participate in the decision-making process. The ruling by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals is important because it allows citizens in AL to sue to enforce the law, even when the state already has taken enforcement action, observers said. Under the Clean Water Act, citizens may sue to enforce the law only if the state had not diligently prosecuted the case and only after filing a 60-day notice they intend to sue. Montgomery environmental lawyer Keith Clark said he estimated the AL Department of Environmental Management fined the polluter $1 or $2 per violation, instead of the minimum $100 fine as mandated by state statute. In addition, AL does not allow public comment on a polluter's punishment and cleanup strategy, in contrast to the federal government. For more on citizen suits, visit http://www.serconline.org/citizensuits/index.html.
 back to top
 
Michigan Environmental Groups Lobby for Wetlands (Associated Press, 1/17/03)
Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm promised during her campaign that she would protect crucial wetlands, taking steps to buy threatened areas with revenue from an expanded bottle deposit law if necessary. Yet even with that pledge in place and key lawmakers, environmental groups and state bureaucrats intent on beefing up protection of Michigan swamps and bogs, the outlook for Michigan wetlands is murky. The state's general fund, which supports environmental programs, is estimated to be $158 million in the red this fiscal year and facing a shortfall of more than $1.5 billion in the fiscal year that starts October 1. Environmentalists agree that despite the demands on general funds, wetland protection should be a priority. For more on protecting wetlands, please see http://www.serconline.org/wetlands/index.html.
back to top 
 
DEP Pushes for Tougher Rules on W. Virginia Logging (The Dominion Post, 1/30/03)
The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is pressuring Governor Bob Wise to more strictly regulate the logging industry, which they say is contributing to destructive flooding in the state According to West Virginia law, pollution reduction is not required of the logging industry. Instead, industry must follow a voluntary "best management practice." Despite a detailed study demonstrating that the floods of May 2001 and June 2002 caused millions of dollars of damage and support from the U.S. Forest Service regarding DEP data, little action has been taken to limit the effects of logging on flooding.
back to top 
 
Report Rates States on Transportation Priorities (STPP)
New financial analysis finds that investments of just over $300 billion over the last ten years under federal transportation programs have helped improve the Interstate highway system and rehabilitate the nation's bridges, though many states have used federal accounting loopholes to shift money out of bridge repair, traffic safety and air pollution reduction accounts in favor of other priorities. The report, titled "The $300 Billion Question: Are We Buying A Better Transportation System?" and released by the national non-profit Surface Transportation Policy Project (STPP), finds that higher priority should be given to investments in cleaner air, safety, mass transit and infrastructure repairs along with new and stricter accountability and performance standards. Over the last ten years, all four areas covered in the report could have seen a far more dramatic improvement had Congress closed accounting loopholes in the current TEA-21 law that allow states to shift funds out of road and bridge repair, traffic safety and clean air accounts and into more traditional highway construction programs. The report points to several states in particular that shifted money away from air pollution reduction and road repair projects in order to build new transportation facilities, many of which have questionable benefits. The report details five recommendations to help spend existing transportation funds more effectively and build more accountability into transportation finance: (1) Require clearer goals and reward performance; (2) Fix accounting loopholes in the current TEA-21 law; (3) Build more transparency into transportation finance; (4) Require stronger "Fix-it-First" provisions for roads and bridges similar to rules that currently exist for public transit systems; and (5) Direct federal transportation dollars beyond state agencies to local decision-makers. Detailed ten-year state by state spending, condition and performance data for road repair, bridge repair, traffic safety and clean air are now available on-line at http://www.transact.org.
back to top 
 
Gov. Would End SUV Tax Break in New York (NY Times 1/28/2003)
Gov. George E. Pataki will propose ending a provision that allows business owners and the self-employed to claim sizable deductions for buying giant sport utility vehicles. In his annual budget address on Wednesday, Governor Pataki will call for closing what he calls a loophole that has let doctors, real estate agents and others buy vehicles like Hummers and Ford Excursions, then take a tax break intended mainly for farmers. The tax break applies to vehicles weighing more than 6,000 pounds when fully loaded. The law was intended to benefit small businesses that used trucks and vans for farming, construction and hauling. The Bush economic plan seeks to increase tax deductions for those who buy the vehicles. Under Mr. Pataki's proposal, nonagricultural businesses in New York that claim the deduction for such a passenger vehicle on their federal tax returns would be required to restore the deduction to their state income statements and pay the state tax on it, a spokeswoman for Mr. Pataki said. The change could apply in the fiscal year that begins on April 1, 2004, if the Legislature approves it, the spokeswoman, Lisa Stoll, said. Mr. Pataki's aides said that the proposal would raise up to $2 million a year in new revenue.
back to top 
 
Penn. Sues EPA over Lax Clean Air Rules (Washington Post 1/28/03)
The Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection has sued the Bush administration over new "Clear Skies" initiative rules that would make it easier for industrial plants and refineries to modernize without having to buy expensive pollution controls. The EPA regulations amount to a major change in the way older industrial plants will have to deal with air pollution when they expand, make major repairs or modify operations to increase efficiency. Nine other states – Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont – filed a joint lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals hours after the Bush administration announced the new rules Dec. 31. Their lawsuit argues that the new approach amounts to a "gutting" of the 1970 law that they say has been responsible for substantial air quality improvements over the past three decades.
back to top 
 
Michigan State Legislators Push Bills to Cut Landfill Imports (Detroit Free Press 1/28/03)
Democratic legislators held news conferences last week to rally support for legislation to curtail the dumping of trash from outside Michigan in state landfills. Two state House bills, similar to ones introduced the past couple of years but never voted on, would limit trash imports by banning beverage containers from landfills and requiring out-of-state garbage to meet the same standards as refuse from within Michigan. Toronto sends all of its trash to southeast Michigan, which has a glut of landfill space and cheap prices. Michigan also gets trash from Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Wisconsin. Some Upper Peninsula communities send household garbage to Canada, but those quantities are dwarfed by what Canada sends south. Four bills were introduced in the Legislature in the past two years. State Sen. Ken Sikkema, R-Wyoming, pledged Republican cooperation to do "whatever we need to do" to stop trash imports. The U.S. Supreme Court and other courts have ruled that garbage is subject to interstate commerce rules, making state boundaries meaningless unless Congress intervenes. But state Rep. Paul Condino, D-Southfield, said state legislators can't wait for Congress to act. He said the two bills that will be introduced were carefully worded to pass legal scrutiny.
back to top 
 
Bills for NM State Water Plan Introduced (Albuquerque Tribune 1/29/03)
Two New Mexico lawmakers hope to get the ball rolling on a statewide water plan, but they say they're willing to let Gov. Bill Richardson redraft their ideas as necessary. A pair of companion bills in the House and Senate would direct the state to develop a water plan to inventory, adjudicate and protect water rights and supplies within NM. The legislation would direct the Interstate Stream Commission to develop a comprehensive state water plan that: Quantifies existing groundwater and surface-water resources. Inventories water rights and current uses. Prepares water budgets for the state and all river basins and aquifer systems in NM. The bill also requires public input and directs the commission to take into account the state's customs, traditions, environment and the livelihoods that depend on water. During his campaign for governor, Richardson said he wanted three new judgeships to establish special courts to decide water rights cases. He also wanted to beef up a variety of water conservation and drought planning efforts. More on water conservation at http://www.serconline.org/waterconservation/pkg_frameset.html.
back to top 
 
Wyoming Panel Kills Instream Flow Bill (Billings Gazette 1/12/03)
An attempt to give farmers more flexibility in use of their allocated water dried up last week because members of the Wyoming House Agriculture Committee wanted more time to study the issue. Five of the nine members are rookie legislators and only two are holdovers from last year's committee. The vote was 6-2 in favor of killing House Bill 147, sponsored by Rep. Kurt Bucholz, R-Saratoga. The intent of the measure is to allow water rights holders to temporarily use the water in ways not authorized by their current permits, especially during drought. Examples include letting the water flow to a different ditch to irrigate another field or keeping the water in the main channel, known as an instream flow right, to benefit fish and aquatic habitat. Current law allows a holder to give, sell or lease rights for temporary use – up to two years – for highway or railroad construction or drilling and producing operations in certain cases. The statutes do not allow a temporary switch of use to benefit the holder of the rights. Laurie Goodman, representing Trout Unlimited, also praised Bucholz' effort and said state water law, largely enacted more than 100 years ago, is not keeping up with science. She also made a pitch for instream flow, saying that keeping water in creeks and streams is not wasted simply because it flows to another user. The beneficial uses to fish and wildlife are well documented, she said. Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Hageman, R-Fort Laramie, told members that the Senate Agriculture Committee preferred to study instream flow issues during the interim. Earlier in the session, the Senate panel killed a broader bill that would have allowed instream flow permits for reasons other than protecting fisheries, including aesthetics, health and safety. For more on streamflow legislation, visit http://www.serconline.org/streamflow/stateactivity.html.
back to top 
 
Wind Energy – A Hot Topic in South Dakota (Rapid City Journal 1/30/03)
South Dakota Gov. Mike Rounds is insisting that landowners get more than just annual payments for allowing huge wind turbines on their property. Landowners should also get some of the benefit as new technology reduces the cost of using the wind to generate electricity, he says. "Part of my responsibility as governor is to make sure our landowners get treated fairly in the long term," Rounds said. "This is a valuable resource, and it will be more valuable in the future. There should be some way to recognize future value as it grows, because I believe that generators will provide more power than they do now, and the price will go up in the future market. There should be some way to recognize that for the benefit of SD landowners, rather than just getting locked into annual payments." Rounds has linked possible tax breaks for wind-energy companies with landowner compensation that goes beyond annual payments. He suggests that the Legislature give wind-power firms varying degrees of breaks on property taxes, sales taxes and the contractor's excise tax. Tax relief should be offered on a sliding scale that is tied to the amount of money firms invest in the projects, the governor said.
back to top 
 
Invasive Algae Smothering Florida Coral Reefs (ENS 1/24/03)
An invasive, coral smothering seaweed has spread like a green tide across the reefs along the south Florida coast. Because the species, a type of macroalgae, is not native to Florida waters, Caulerpa brachypus has no natural predators, a problem compounded by the fact that the species is very hardy, and can spread rapidly if the nutrients it needs are available. Based on past research, scientists believe that the spread of this and other macroalgae species, in Florida and at many troubled reefs around the globe, is driven by nutrients from land based pollution. In South Florida, one of several key sources of such pollution is hundreds of millions of gallons of nutrient rich treated sewage pumped offshore each day. C. brachypus's explosive growth devastates coral reefs. Besides smothering and killing the coral itself, it blankets the food on which many fish rely, forcing them and their predators away from a reef. Florida's 2002 budget, as approved by the state legislature, had included about half a million dollars for a scientific team to study the macroalgae problem, but this funding was later eliminated by a line item veto. C. taxifolia was also discovered off the coast of California in 2000, and the state has launched a massive effort to prevent the spread of the toxic algae. For more on controlling invasive species, visit http://www.serconline.org/invasives/pkg_frameset.html.
back to top 
 
CA Sues Grocers over Lack of Mercury Warnings (ENS 1/27/03)
California's Attorney General recently filed suit against five grocery chains to force them to post warnings about the presence of mercury in the fish they sell. Under California's proposition 65, a ballot initiative passed in 1986, businesses must provide clear and reasonable warning of exposure to known carcinogens and reproductive toxins. Mercury and methylmercury, which can cause neurological damage, both fall in this category, and are both found in fish. Undercover testing by two environmental groups found high levels of mercury in fish from the five stores, prompting the suit. Attorney General Lockyer also cited public health agency warnings against consuming large amounts of tuna, swordfish and shark because of the high levels of mercury they contain. These fish are especially dangerous to pregnant women and nursing mothers. For more on how your state can deal with the dangers of mercury, please see http://www.serconline.org/mercury/pkg_frameset.html.
back to top 
 
Court Reverses Ban on Dumping Coal Waste into Streams (ENN 1/31/03)
A federal appeals court overturned a lower-court ruling that blocked coal companies from sweeping rubble from mountaintop removal mining into streams, which could allow for more permits to bury Appalachian streams beneath huge valley fill-waste piles. A three-judge panel on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned U.S. District Judge Charles Haden II's ruling, which was issued last May. Judge Haden's ruling said that the federal Clean Water Act blocked the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from authorizing such valley fills. Haden's ruling came less than a week after the Bush administration announced changed to federal rules that would remove restrictions on filling valleys and streams. Many coal companies in West Virginia and Kentucky dynamite the tops off mountains to get to valuable low-sulphur coal seams burned for electricity. Waste rubble is swept off cliffs into valleys, a process, which at times, buries streams. The case was sent back to the lower court for review.
back to top

For more information about SERC, or to use our services, contact our national headquarters at:
State Environmental Resource Center
106 East Doty Street, Suite 200 § Madison, Wisconsin 53703
Phone: 608-252-9800 § Fax: 608-252-9828
Email: [email protected]