Livestock
Friendly Counties |
The Livestock-Friendly
County Program, initiated by the Minnesota Milk Producers Association
(MMPA), was passed by the Minnesota Legislature in 2002 (HF3183),
and a similar program in Nebraska was signed into law (LB754) on May
28, 2003. The program is designed to promote agriculture throughout
MN and NE by recognizing counties that value the economic contributions
of agriculture and are willing to take steps to provide an economically
friendly environment for long-term success. MMPA initially created
the program with a financial incentive for designated counties, however
due to financially tight times the financial incentive was eliminated.
The voluntary program, on the face of it, seems to promote the agricultural
industry in a positive way. However, the devil is in the details,
as many opponents of the program have pointed out. An unfunded program
gives little incentive for counties to join on. The most disturbing
portion of the program requires counties to be "governed by a
regulatory framework conducive to a viable animal agriculture sector".
The Minnesota Department of Agriculture website labels counties as
anti-livestock if they limit the size of an operation that can be
built, place moratoria on feedlots or expansions of current feedlots,
and prohibit earthen basins to store manure. To be ‘livestock
friendly', counties cannot have these kind of regulations. The program
also eliminates local zoning control and forces counties to accept
farms known as concentrated animal feeding operations. This is a backdoor
attempt to foster unsustainable agriculture, while eliminating family
farms and polluting the environment. To further demonstrate the needlessness
of the program, no counties in Minnesota have taken the steps to be
designated, two bills (HF 861 & SF1027) were introduced in 2003
to repeal the law, and officials have publicly stated if no county
is designated the program would be eliminated. There are more pressing
issues in agriculture that states should be dealing instead of developing
a harmful and unpopular program. |
|