Lake
Erie Shoreline for Sale |
HB 218, a bill that could allow the transfer of thousands of acres
of public land into the hands of private property owners, is making
its way through the Ohio state legislature. If this bill is enacted
it would seriously compromise the rights of individuals to utilize
the shoreline for fishing and general recreation. Federal law and
previous conditions of Ohio's statehood require that any land lakeward
of the high water mark is to be held in trust for the public. HB 218
would redefine the boundaries of Lake Erie from its "southerly
shore" to "where the water hits the land." The international
boundary shared with Canada would remain as a defining boundary. What
makes the bill more interesting is a ruling by the Ohio State Supreme
Court, which maintains that the Ohio General Assembly cannot abandon
its responsibility to hold the land in trust for the people of Ohio.
It appears the House will abandon its responsibility and fall victim
to the private property rights movement. The bill text also inserts
language that the interests of private property owners in coastal
areas need to be taken into consideration for the coastal management
plan that affects the lake. Additionally, it would allow littoral
owners to make "reasonable use" of submerged lands and water,
fronting their land. What constitutes reasonable is not defined. Redefining
the boundary to "where the water hits the land," does not
take into consideration variable water levels and recent conditions
that have dropped the water levels of many of the Great Lakes below
their normal averages. The authors of this bill should realize that
water levels are variable and many of the recent drops in water level
are human-caused. Redefining the boundary would severely hurt the
shoreline environment, and would do little good for the overall health
of Lake Erie. The authors apparently do not remember that they are
public officials who should be acting in the interest of the public
-- not a few developers who seek to make a couple of dollars at the
cost of the enjoyment of a public shoreline. |
|