Trumping
County Rights – To Trap or Not to Trap? |
The US Sportsmen’s Alliance (http://www.ussportsmen.org/)
is taking part in a debate in New York State regarding who has the
right to regulate trapping – state wildlife officials or counties.
Four separate bills have been introduced. A1531 and S1771 propose
that a constitutional amendment be added to the state constitution
guaranteeing the right to hunt, fish, and trap. This amendment is
similar to ones recently passed in Wisconsin, and introduced in two
other states. Even though the bills intend to reaffirm that the state
is the entity that regulates trapping, they barely mention this point.
The other two bills, A480 and S2901, would empower counties to enact
trapping laws that are stricter than the state’s standard. The
introduction of these bills is in response to three court decisions
striking down enacted county laws that were stricter than state laws.
A480 and S2901 would allow counties to place stricter limits on trapping
– not eliminate the practice, as the US Sportsmen’s Alliance
claims. Coincidentally, one week after these bills were introduced,
A1531 and S1771 were proposed in an effort to counteract them. Sponsors
of the county bills assert their legislation reflects the changing
demographics of the counties, and allows local officials to make decisions
on issues affecting their municipalities. Sponsors of the constitutional
amendment believe that state wildlife officials should make decisions
regarding trapping; however, this point is lost in language supporting
New York’s long hunting history. A constitutional amendment
is unnecessary and irrelevant to the debate on whether counties should
be allowed to regulate trapping. Adding irony to the debate over trapping
is the US Sportsmen’s Alliance calling for state wildlife officials
to regulate an aspect of hunting. |
|