What
About a State's Right to a Healthy Environment? |
Offshore oil drilling and ozone in California. Factory farm pollution
in North Carolina. Power plant regulation in the northeast. Across
the country, states are finding that the Bush Administration's environmental
policies are less stringent than their own and, in some cases, the
administration is even limiting the ability of states to protect their
environment. In North Carolina, for example, factory-style farms are
subject to state regulations requiring various permits and waste treatment
systems, and the state currently has a ban on new hog farms. These
rules are more stringent than recently released EPA guidelines. Environmental
advocates in North Carolina are concerned that large scale animal
farmers will use the new EPA rules as leverage to weaken the state
regulations (Raleigh News & Observer 12/17/02). In California,
a new smog reduction plan proposed by the EPA has state officials
worried that ozone levels might actually increase, because of the
long phase-in period. The Bush administration is also quietly rewriting
the rules governing coastal drilling to limit the influence of states.
A letter signed by Rep. Lois Capps and 90 other members of Congress
calls the revision a "pernicious assault on states' rights."
(LA Times 8/21/03). On the opposite coast, thirteen states have again
filed a legal challenge to the EPA's revised New Source Review regulations,
which would allow many older power plants to upgrade without reducing
the amount they pollute (Hartford Courant 8/21/03). It seems the administration
supports states' rights -- unless it's the right to a healthy environment. |
|