|
|
|
Groundwater Withdrawal
Permitting
(We are running this spotlight for a second week for our readers
who may have missed it because of the Thanksgiving holiday.)
Our
water is running out, and we need to pay attention. Increased
growth continues to strain water resources as more agricultural,
municipal, recreational, and commercial users attempt to quench
their thirst. Ironically, as water withdrawals increase, users
may be destroying the very resource upon which they depend. In
many states, there is no requirement that large water withdrawals
be permitted by a coordinating agency responsible for juggling
the multiple uses and users of shared water systems. Without a
permit, large water withdrawals are difficult to monitor and can
cause a number of problems. Water withdrawals and diversions can
severely alter the natural timing and recreational uses of a stream
including fishing and boating which can hurt rural communities
dependent on revenue from those activities. For information on
how your state can implement a system of groundwater withdrawal
permitting, visit: http://www.serconline.org/groundwaterWithPermit/pkg_frameset.html. |
back
to top |
|
|
Illinois:
Protection Pays Off for Some State Species (Chicago Tribune
11/22)
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-0311220200nov22,1,413634.story?coll=chi-news-hed
The Illinois
Endangered Species Protection Board began the process of updating
the endangered and threatened species lists last week for the
first time in four years, and experts reported many successes.
The falcon, the eastern ribbonsnake, and the Iowa darter are among
the animals that soon could escape the state's endangered rolls,
becoming threatened species instead. The otter, pied-billed grebe,
and others may be removed from the threatened list altogether.
Last week the board accepted recommendations to make 24 changes
involving animals and 57 for plants, not including formal name
changes for many other species. The Illinois Endangered Species
Protection Board grew from the 1973 federal Endangered Species
Protection Act. It advises the Illinois Department of Natural
Resources on which plant and animal species are threatened or
endangered. It completed its most recent revisions in 1999. Many
of the plants and animals were more adaptive than previously believed,
said board Chairman Dan Gooch. But for most, he said, recovery
resulted from concerted efforts at conservation or habitat restoration
that allowed plants and animals to return on their own. "Wildlife
management sure isn't easy," said Nina Fascione, of the national
watchdog group Defenders of Wildlife, who added that Illinois
still "needs to take a cautionary approach and make sure
that these populations are truly sustainable for the long term."
For more information on how your state can protect endangered
species, visit: http://www.serconline.org/esa/index.html.
|
back
to top |
|
|
New
Laws Target Ecoterrorism Acts (Christian Science Monitor
11/26)
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1126/p02s01-usju.html
The corporate-funded American
Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) has been promoting model legislation
that makes any property damage or destruction in the name of animal
rights or environmental protection a category of domestic terrorism.
The legislation would increase penalties and punish those who
assist or finance such acts. It also would create a "terrorist
registry" where a photo and other personal information about
anybody found guilty under the law would be posted on a website
for at least three years -- similar to registries of sex offenders.
So far, lawmakers in Texas and New York have introduced ALEC's
model language; Oklahoma, Arkansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio,
and Oregon have introduced bills with similar intent. The American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other supporters of civil liberties
say such laws, if enacted, would violate constitutional protections
of free speech and political activity. Mainstream environmental
groups have spoken out against radical organizations engaged in
destructive and dangerous acts. But they see laws now being promoted
in Congress and state houses as vehicles for anti-environmental
special interests. "The legislation is so sweeping and nebulous
it could also cover nonviolent civil disobedience or even ordinary
environmental activism," says Andrew Becker of the Sierra
Club. Because some proposed state laws aimed at ecoterrorism could
be interpreted as outlawing financial support for those engaged
in nonviolent civil disobedience, Mr. Becker says, "holding
a bake sale to support tree sitters could be a terrorist offense."
For more information about ALEC's Animal and Ecological Terrorism
Act, see http://www.serconline.org/alec/alec21.html.
|
back
to top |
|
|
House
Members Urge Bush Not to Change Regulations (ENN
11/26)
http://www.enn.com/news/2003-11-26/s_10794.asp
Half of the 435-member House,
including 26 Republicans, wrote President Bush on Tuesday
urging him to scrap his administration's efforts to change
Clean Water Act regulations that could reduce the scope
of waterways protected nationwide. Those efforts could lead
to more water pollution, wetlands losses, and state financial
burdens, according to Reps. John Dingell, D-Mich.; Jim Saxton,
R-N.J.; Jim Leach, R-Iowa; and Jim Oberstar, D-Minn. In
the letter, 218 House members, including all but 14 of 205
Democrats, said Bush's preliminary rule-making efforts "represent
attempts to remove federal protection from waters -- including
many streams, wetlands, and natural ponds -- that have been
covered by the Clean Water Act for decades." The Environmental
Protection Agency began a new rule-making process in January
that could result in redefining what bodies of water should
be protected under the Clean Water Act. It also issued guidelines
for federal wetlands regulators to use in interpreting a
Supreme Court ruling two years ago that cast doubt on protections
for wetlands unconnected to larger waters. The representatives
gathered the signatures with help from environmental groups
such as the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council,
and National Wildlife Federation.
|
back
to top |
|
Bottled Water Plant
Challenged in Wisconsin (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
11/24)http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/nov03/187803.asp
Approval
of a proposed water-bottling business by the Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources (DNR) has been challenged by environmental
groups and the Menominee Indian tribe, who fear the water
withdrawals would harm the local watershed by driving down
groundwater supplies that feed into the Wolf River. The
Menominee tribe's reservation is just north of the project.
The tribe filed a petition in Brown County Circuit Court
that challenges the DNR's approval of the plant. Melissa
K. Scanlan, an attorney representing the opponents, said
that the DNR ignored its authority under the "public
trust doctrine", which holds that all waters of the
state are public resources owned by all citizens. The petition
also contends that the DNR should have conducted an environmental
assessment of the proposed well. For more information on
how your state can protect groundwater, visit: http://www.serconline.org/groundwaterWithPermit/pkg_frameset.html. |
back
to top |
|
Michigan Fails to
Preserve Wetlands (The Detroit News 11/23)
http://www.detnews.com/2003/metro/0311/24/a01-332565.htm
Michigan
has lost hundreds of wetlands to development -- land that
is vital to everything from providing homes for animals
to preventing pesticides from seeping into the groundwater.
Lax state oversight has diluted a law mandating the replacement
of every inch of wetland destroyed by construction. More
than half of the 775 wetlands that were supposed to be built
in the past decade are inadequate and at least 125 of these
were never built, according to state records. The 1979 law
requiring the construction of man-made wetlands for lost
natural ones is tough to enforce because the state has 32
environmental inspectors to oversee 2,200 wetlands -- almost
70 apiece. Michigan officials said they are working to remedy
the situation uncovered by a 2001 report from the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency by hiring six new inspectors. In addition,
three years of records, from 1990-92, are missing from the
southeast Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) office,
one of the areas experiencing the most intensive development.
Robert Zbiciak, a DEQ employee, said developers sometimes
do not build replacement wetlands because they believe they
won't get caught. "Put yourself in the place of a developer,"
he said. "It's going to cost you $100,000 to build
a wetland, and there's a 75 percent chance that no one will
come and look to see if you did it and a 75 percent chance
you won't get caught if you don't build the wetland."
For more information on protecting wetlands in your state,
see http://www.serconline.org/wetlands/pkg_frameset.html. |
back
to top |
|
Minnesota's Active
Campaign Keeps Invasive Species Out (The Duluth
News Tribune 11/24)
http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/news/7337131.htm
Minnesota
is better off than many other states in fighting the uphill
battle against invasive species. Some factors contributing
to this success are a cold climate and the state's location
midway between the two coasts, where invasive species often
are introduced and addressed first. Another, and perhaps
more instructive, factor is the state's relatively early
response to invasive threats. Before many other states committed
resources to combat invasive species, the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources (DNR) and the Agriculture Department
were already at work. In 1991, the legislature established
an Exotic Species Program within the DNR that's responsible
for monitoring and managing harmful exotics, including animals
and aquatics. The Agriculture Department handles exotic
insects and plants. Earlier this year, the legislature strengthened
plant-protection standards and raised the exotic species
program's budget from $1.2 million a year to $1.6 million.
"The states I talk to, they look to Minnesota as a
leader in terms of education and changing boaters' behavior,"
said Jeff Gunderson, associate director of Minnesota Sea
Grant in Duluth. To find out more about preventing the spread
of invasive species, visit: http://www.serconline.org/invasives/pkg_frameset.html
and http://www.serconline.org/ballast/index.html.
|
back
to top |
|
Judge Shuts Down
Michigan Bottled Water Plant (ENN 11/26)
http://www.enn.com/news/2003-11-26/s_10793.asp
A
judge ordered the company that produces Ice Mountain bottled
water to stop drawing water from wells in a Michigan county
on Tuesday, saying the operation has damaged the environment.
The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by environmentalists
who said the company's water-bottling operation has depleted
neighboring lakes, streams, and wetlands. Ice Mountain is
one of the most popular brands of bottled water in the Midwest.
Its parent company is Nestle Waters North America, the maker
of brands such as Poland Spring, Arrowhead, and Deer Park.
The company operates four wells in Mecosta County, in western
Michigan and pumps the water to its nearby bottling plant.
The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality's water
division had granted a permit allowing Ice Mountain's water-bottling
plant to withdraw up to 400 gallons per minute, or 576,000
gallons per day. Circuit Court Judge Lawrence Root ruled
that continued withdrawals will exacerbate existing problems
with lower lake levels, sluggish streams, and drier wetlands
in the area. "I am unable to find that a specific pumping
rate lower than 400 gallons per minute, or any other rate
to date, will reduce the effects and impact to a level that
is not harmful," said Judge Root. Terry Swier, a founder
of Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation, said Root's
decision established an important precedent. For more information
on how your state can protect groundwater, visit: http://www.serconline.org/groundwaterWithPermit/pkg_frameset.html.
|
back
to top |
|
New York Council
Eyes Cleaner Air (Environmental News Service 11/25)
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/nov2003/2003-11-25-09.asp#anchor8
(subscription required)
On
December 1, the New York City Council will hold a hearing,
and possibly vote on a piece of legislation that would require
the city to use cleaner fuel and pollution control technology
for non-road engines that are used in equipment owned or
leased by the city. Non-road diesel engines are a major
source of harmful air emissions, including fine particulate
matter, which has been linked to various respiratory illnesses
such as asthma. The legislation would reduce the amount
air pollution in a city that is plagued by dirty air and
correspondingly high asthma rates. The legislation calls
for an immediate switch to the use ultra low sulfur diesel
in non-road diesel engines, which, combined with the use
of pollution control technology, can reduce diesel emission
by up to 90 percent. |
back
to top |
|
South Carolina Targets
Pollution Crimes (The State 11/24)
http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/local/7336328.htm
With
the support of South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster,
state Senator Jake Knotts, R-Lexington, has introduced a
bill that would give the state grand jury the authority
to prosecute environmental crimes. Under the current laws,
ways in which the state is allowed to collect information
to prosecute environmental crimes are restricted, forcing
the state to rely heavily on the federal grand jury to gather
the necessary information. The bill proposed by Sen. Knotts
would give the state the ability to prosecute environmental
crimes without referring them to federal prosecutors. The
bill faces opposition from businesses, which argue that
federal agencies have done an adequate job, and there is
no need to extend state jurisdiction to environmental crimes.
McMaster, who is also a former U.S. attorney, disagrees,
"We need a grand jury that operates like the federal
grand jury," he says. Sen. Knotts adds that businesses
have no reason to worry about the broader state authority,
unless they are breaking the law. |
back
to top |
|
|