|
|
|
Clean Power
Most
Americans think of electricity as "clean" and are shocked
to learn that power plants are the single worst industrial contributor
to air pollution in the United States. Power plants contribute
70% of the sulfur dioxide emissions (SO2), 33% of nitrogen oxide
emissions (NOx), 23% of mercury emissions, and 35% of man-made
carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. When the federal Clean Air Act
was enacted over 30 years ago during the Nixon Administration,
big utility companies successfully lobbied against stringent controls
by saying the oldest, dirtiest power plants would soon be replaced
by new state-of-the-art facilities. Many of those out-dated facilities,
which were already old in 1970, are still in use. In some cases,
power plants from 1922 are still in operation and do not meet
the environmental requirements that every new facility must follow.
Because of this 1970 loophole in the law, dirty plants have been
"grandfathered" from following the air pollution controls
required by the Clean Air Act for new power plants. These old
plants "legally" pollute the air at rates of 2 to 13
times higher than new plants with modern emissions controls. It
is now up to the states to plug this loophole. The Clean Power
Act will eliminate the loophole and cut power plant emissions
of the four major pollutants (SO2, NOx, mercury, and CO2). For
more information on how your state can implement the Clean Power
Act, visit: http://www.serconline.org/clean/index.html. |
back
to top |
|
|
California:
Testing People for Pollutants (LA Times 10/6)
http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-he-biomonitoring6oct06,1,1246713.story
Free Registration Required
California SB 689, written by
Sen. Deborah Ortiz and sponsored by the Breast Cancer Fund, a
nonprofit health advocacy group, would make California the first
state in the nation to regularly test mothers' milk for dangerous
chemicals. The bill, which proposes a two-year biomonitoring program,
passed a Senate committee before stalling. It will be reviewed
in January. "Biomonitoring is telling us what's in our bodies
and are [the levels of those toxic substances] going up or down
-- are there things we need to worry about?" says Kim Hooper,
a state scientist who is co-directing a biomonitoring study in
Torrance, the Central Valley, and Marin County. That study would
be expanded statewide if the bill passes. Such a study could point
out trends in chemical exposures, identify disproportionately
affected communities, link exposures to disease, assess the effectiveness
of current regulations, and set priorities for research and legislation.
Previous biomonitoring studies have detected more than 200 toxic
substances in breast milk. More than 85,000 synthetic chemicals
have been introduced in the last 50 years for industrial, farming,
and other uses, yet more than 90% of them have not been tested
for their effects on human health. However, studies have linked
46 chemicals to mammary tumors in animals, according to the National
Toxicology Program.
|
back
to top |
|
|
ALEC's
Model State Data Quality Bill
The Model State Data Quality bill
is an attempt by ALEC to push an anti-science agenda in states
that will suppress legitimate scientific findings and allow corporate
interests to push their agendas through. This bill is one of two
bills the Center for Regulatory Effectiveness is pushing. The
State Data Quality bill is modeled after the ominous Federal Data
Quality act that is currently being used by the Competitive Enterprise
Institute, a conservative Washington DC think tank, to suppress
climate change data. ALEC alleges one of the purposes of the act
is to "require that agencies of this State which disseminate
information to the public that is likely to influence their decisions,
choices, rights, or duties attempt to ensure and maximize, consistent
with available resources and considering the costs and benefits
involved, the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of
such information." Simply stated, only a few individuals
will determine whether or not data is legitimate, and the data
may never be released because it may be deemed too expensive.
Why would individuals seek to withhold data that states a company
is not in compliance with environmental regulations or a chemical
found in water supplies is at levels too high for safe consumption?
The model goes on to say that, "all information disseminated
by an agency shall be subject to standards of quality that are
appropriate to its significance, type, and timeliness," and
this explains little as to who considers the data to be legitimate.
This is in sharp contrast to the federal law which regulates which
categories of data may be subjected to a quality provision. Another
provision asks that if the data being circulated is found to violate
the principles of this act its circulation must stop immediately.
In an age where agencies need to be able to share vital information,
it is important not to place barriers on communication. This act
is clearly unnecessary and is an attempt to suppress data that
reflects poorly on ALEC's favored 'environmental' policies.
|
back
to top |
|
|
Maine:
Conservation Easement to Protect River System (Boston
Globe 10/10)
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2003/10/10/agreement_to_protect_river_system/
A $7.8 million conservation
easement and land purchase agreement will be used to protect
one of the Northeast's least developed river systems and
stems from the cooperation of a number of organizations,
including International Paper (IP). The agreement will protect
approximately 25,000 acres along the Machias River and several
of its down east tributaries. Eighteen thousand four hundred
forty-three acres will be protected under the conservation
easement and the remaining 6,400 acres will be purchased
outright. IP will continue to own the forest land and lease
lots, but allow the public access to the land. A number
of species are being protected under the deal including
moose, wild turkeys, and black bears. Additionally, 86%
of the Atlantic salmon habitat within the Machias River
system, one of the country's most important spawning and
nursery habitats for the federally recognized endangered
species, will be protected. For more information on how
your state can protect valuable habitat, visit: http://www.serconline.org/conservationfunding/index.html.
|
back
to top |
|
States
Lead in Global Warming Fight (Christian Science Monitor,
10/10)
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1010/p01s03-usgn.html
As the Bush Administration
refuses to participate in Kyoto Protocol negotiations and
Congress is considering a revision to the Energy Policy
Act that would greatly expand fossil fuel production and
greenhouse gas emissions, states are creating their own
programs to combat global warming. Ten states are even taking
the federal government to court for its failure to effectively
and comprehensively address greenhouse gases. California,
Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey,
New York, Oregon, Washington, and Vermont are expected to
sue the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over its decision
not to regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant under the
Clean Air Act. California is leading the effort in part
because it feels that the EPA's decision will make it easier
for the automobile industry to attack the state's innovative
law restricting vehicle emissions. For more information
on how your state can craft a clean and sustainable energy
policy, read our report at http://www.serconline.org/cleanenergy.pdf.
|
back
to top |
|
Delaware:
Environmental Public Hearing Rules at Issue (Newszap.com
10/9)
No link available Environmental
officials in Delaware have garnered much criticism about
the way in which they have been conducting public hearings.
Environmental organizations and citizens of Delaware have
complained that officials conducting public hearings have
intentionally constrained the public's ability to voice
their opinion on environmental issues. Alan Muller, the
executive director of Green Delaware, has called the officials'
efforts to curtail public comment, "[o]ne of the most
dangerous assaults to democracy that's occurring in Delaware."
As a result of the criticisms, the Department of Natural
Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) is developing
guidelines to govern how public hearings are carried out.
A number of environmental organizations, including Sierra
Club and Green Delaware, have submitted recommendations
for the DNREC, but DNREC deputy secretary David Small said
that the guidelines would be developed internally. |
back
to top |
|
Maine:
Sprawl Threatens Way of Life (Portland Press Herald
10/8)
http://www.pressherald.com/news/state/031008sprawl.shtml
At the first annual meeting
of GrowSmart, a statewide organization dedicated to reducing
sprawl, Governor John Baldacci of Maine announced his campaign
to curtail sprawl in the state. According to Gov. Baldacci,
sprawl poses a threat to the state's waterfronts, coastlines,
forests, farms, countryside, and "Maine's way of life."
Along with the environmental dangers which sprawl poses,
it also costs the state an estimated $50 million each year
to expand public services to the new developments. In order
to combat the problem of sprawl, Gov. Baldacci has directed
the State Planning Office to produce a smart growth agenda
by January. The agenda will include programs to create affordable
housing, prevent the loss of additional farm and forest
land, and encourage centralized growth. Acknowledging that
growth is important for Maine, Gov. Baldacci said, "We
simply need to guide where it occurs... to promote the Maine
way of life." For more information about suburban sprawl,
visit: http://www.serconline.org/sprawl/pkg_frameset.html.
|
back
to top |
|
Montana Sued over
Coal-Bed Methane Drilling (Missoulian 10/7)
http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2003/10/08/mtracker/news/68methane.txt
The
Northern Plains Resource Council is suing the state of Montana
over coal-bed methane development, saying that it wastes
groundwater and harms the environment. The suit, filed against
Department of Environmental Quality, Board of Oil and Gas
Conservation, and Department of Natural Resources and Conservation,
seeks a moratorium on coal-bed methane drilling until better
controls are instituted to minimize air pollution, water
use, and other environmental effects. "There are ways
to develop coal-bed methane resources without harming the
land and the water and the air and the fabric of our farming
and ranching," attorney Jack Tuholske said Tuesday. |
back
to top |
|
Massachusetts: Land
Preservation Funds Threatened (Boston Globe 10/6)
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2003/10/06/senator_says_funds_for_land_threatened/
The
chair of the Senate's Natural Resources and Agricultural
Committee, along with environmentalists, alleges that spending,
for an initiative to preserve open space, is being slashed.
The program has preserved over 200,000 acres from development
since 1991. Currently, Massachusetts loses about 40 acres
of land per day to development, according to Erin Rowland
of the Massachusetts chapter of the Trust for Public Land.
Earlier it was estimated the $70 million would have been
available for preservation programs under a 2002 bond bill
for capital expenditures. A spokesperson for Gov. Romney
said that money would be available for this fiscal year,
but it was undetermined as to the amount that would be available.
However, indications recently have led many environmentalists
to believe that little money will be available to preserve
open spaces. For more information on how your state can
protect open spaces from development, visit: http://www.serconline.org/conservationfunding/index.html. |
back
to top |
|
New
Hampshire: Big Oil and Clean Water Don't Mix (Concord
Monitor 10/7)
http://www.cmonitor.com/stories/news/state2003/mtbe%5Fsidebar%5F2003.shtml
On October 6th, New Hampshire's
Attorney General filed suit against 22 of the largest oil
companies in the U.S., alleging that they are responsible
for contamination of the state's groundwater supply. The
state claims that a chemical component of gasoline added
in order to reduce air pollution, methyl tertiary butyl
ether (MtBE), is seeping into its groundwater. The suit
seeks unspecified clean-up costs and damages. MtBE is a
bigger problem for New Hampshire than other states for two
reasons: 60 percent of residents get their drinking water
from groundwater supplies, and the state's geology -- abundant
fractured rock -- increases the rate at which and likelihood
that pollutants will seep into groundwater. The New Hampshire
lawsuit was filed as the U.S. Congress debates an energy
bill containing an exemption for oil companies from liability
if gasoline additives like MtBE pollute groundwater supplies.
But state officials say they're not trying to influence
national policy. New Hampshire senior assistant attorney
general Maureen Smith stated simply, "MtBE does not
belong in our drinking water."
|
back
to top |
|
Wisconsin:
Bill to Repeal Smart Growth Law (Wisconsin State
Journal 10/5) http://www.madison.com/wisconsinstatejournal/local/58196.php
Wisconsin's Smart Growth
program has the support of environmentalists, real estate
agents, builders, and town and city governments. But at
least one state legislator wants to abolish it. Representative
Mary Williams recently introduced AB 435, which would repeal
Smart Growth without offering any alternative for statewide
planning. Williams says the program is intrusive and expensive
for small, rural towns. "They want to plan when they're
good and ready to plan," she stated. Since 2000, the
Smart Growth program has awarded communities across the
state a total of 546 grants to implement local plans containing
nine elements, including housing, transportation, agriculture,
land use, economic development, and natural and cultural
resources. Under the program, most local governments are
required to have comprehensive plans in place by 2010. Smart
Growth supporters are willing to make changes to accommodate
smaller towns; Representative Sheryl Albers will introduce
legislation reducing planning requirements for communities
with less than 22 people per square mile. For more information
on planning to avoid sprawl, visit: http://www.serconline.org/sprawl/pkg_frameset.html.
|
back
to top |
|
California: Restricting
State Use of SUVs (San Jose Mercury News 10/2)
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/6919929.htm
Outgoing
Gov. Gray Davis is taking several steps to protect California's
air quality before he leaves office. He announced recently
that he would sign a bill that limits the number of SUVs
that the state can purchase or lease. The measure, written
by Senator John Burton, eliminates all non-essential SUVs
from California's fleet by 2005. The State Treasurer's office
estimates that the move will save $14.3 million. Davis also
signed a bill encouraging state agencies to buy low-rolling-resistance
tires, which improve gas mileage. He will also begin the
process to allow hybrid vehicles to use carpool lanes. For
more ways your state can save money and help the environment
at the same time, visit: http://www.serconline.org/greenscissors.html. |
back
to top |
|
|